Your campus-scale AI site in Kerr County: surveyed land, executed LCRA and PEC instruments, and a 2,100 MW / 345 kV study path. Firm capacity is the next utility workstream — not a reason to wait on the conversation.
Kerr County, Texas · Aerial imagery + source terrain (2× relief). Source ranch outline and conceptual campus zones; not a survey or as-built record. Imagery: Esri, Vantor, Earthstar Geographics & GIS User Community.
How to walk the site with your team.
Land, access, and the ground you would take.
You start with a recorded tract, access on the instruments, slope-screened hall area, and a Phase I with no recognized environmental conditions on its stated scope.
The campus card your team will brief against.
This campus sits in Kerrville, Kerr County, on ERCOT West at 345 kV. The hall-planning card is 4 × 500 MW (2,000 MW). The utility study request is 2,100 MW. Both are planning figures — the workstream is to make them real against your load.
Land control you can brief. Three acreage scopes stay separate.
A recorded deed and title survey give you a campus you can plan. The survey is 3,979.63 acres. Deed, Phase I, and appraisal used different scopes — we keep them labeled. Title-close work is a tenant workstream, not a missing campus.
Recorded access, plus slope-screened area for campus layout.
You have recorded access and conceptual campus geometry. Slope screens are a planning start — we engineer pads, drainage, and the master plan as the next site workstream.
ASCENDENT

No recognized environmental conditions on the Phase I scope. Field and design studies are the next site workstream.
The January 2026 Phase I reported no recognized environmental conditions on its 4,005.86-acre, 24-parcel scope. Targeted geotech, karst, and layout studies are the next workstream as halls land.
Grid path, on-site generation, water, and fiber.
You already have executed study and facility instruments and a first-cut engineering path. The 2,100 MW / 345 kV figure is the study basis. We close supply, firm capacity, and energization with your load case.

A 10% substation package and a schematic corridor. Issued design is the next engineering workstream.
The LCRA study names proposed points on Big Hill–Kendall 345 kV. A 10% substation package and a schematic 7-mile corridor are already in file. Rights, the I-10 crossing, and issued design are the work we do next.
A Phase 1 generation path you can design against. Binding fuel is the next commercial workstream.
You have a gas origination path and a preliminary Phase 1 plan: 442 CAT G3520K engines totaling 1,105 MW. Binding fuel, the lateral, and plant commitments are the work we close with you. Planning figures are not installed kit.
The file already names the next wells, the nearby backbone, and the agency path.
Well-quality testing and a 24-location prospecting program define a source-development pathway.
Drill and pump-test priority targets; establish rights/permits and the phased water/wastewater balance.
The Kerr Summary reports a 48-strand LCRA backbone about 0.11 mile / 600 feet from the northern boundary.
Confirm allocation or IRU terms, surveyed laterals, latency and physically diverse end-to-end routes.
Rural land-use context and a planned TCEQ air-permit workstream identify the agency pathway.
Maintain a complete permit register, current application status and agency correspondence tied to the schedule.
Well tests and interpreted groundwater are a source program, not a supply guarantee. Backbone adjacency is the start of a fiber contract. Planned applications still have to be filed and issued — that is the permitting workstream. Source [1] · water-01/03, fiber-01, permit-01/02.

Map, concept, and readiness.
These views put the tract, the campus concept, and the stored readiness snapshot in front of your team.
Start here when you want to see the land.
What is in hand, and the next action in each domain.

Confirmed and submitted are file statuses. Use the annex when you want the citation behind a sentence.
Source [1] · Complete authored domain record
ASCENDENT

ASCENDENT

A planning snapshot for this campus — not a ranking of other sites.
The stored campus snapshot is 85 / Viable, dated 2 September 2026. All seven categories are shown. These are planning scores for this site, not an independent rating or a comparison set.
How we work with your team on this site.
The file is ready for a tenant conversation. Bring your requirements. We close the remaining workstreams with you — and we do not treat the study basis as power already in the building.

Containerized storage is the flexible-capacity story — not a committed megawatt-hour award.
Storage sits between generation and the halls so you can buffer and shape load. Blocks can land as the campus grows. This is how the site can work — we do not invent a storage award or a ready date.
Named workstreams. The full action list lives in the source annex.
These are the workstreams we run with a tenant — grid, fuel, title, corridor, water, fiber, and one governing schedule.
Each domain already has a named next step. Claims, notes, and citations live in the source annex.
Open workstreams and files that do not yet agree. Not a failure report.
When two files disagree, we show both. Use the campus brief with the originals, the variant register, and the remaining requests.